region.getCachePerfStats().incConflatedEventsCount(); persistConflictingTag(region, tag); throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException();
region.getCachePerfStats().incConflatedEventsCount(); persistConflictingTag(region, tag); throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException();
logger.debug("conflict resolver rejected the event for {}", event.getKey()); throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException("WAN conflict resolver rejected the operation"); logger.debug("disallowing event for " + event.getKey()); throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException("conflicting WAN event detected");
basicInvalidate(event, true, forceNewEntry); if (event.isConcurrencyConflict()) { // bug #45520 - we must throw this for the CacheClientUpdater throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException();
basicInvalidate(event, true, forceNewEntry); if (event.isConcurrencyConflict()) { // bug #45520 - we must throw this for the CacheClientUpdater throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException();
throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException("conflicting event detected");
throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException("conflicting event detected");
log.fine("conflict resolver rejected the event for " + event.getKey()); throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException("WAN conflict resolver rejected the operation"); log.fine("disallowing event for " + event.getKey()); throw new ConcurrentCacheModificationException("conflicting WAN event detected");